Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot
    X tries to limit creator revenue for foreign influencers but Musk intervenes

    X tries to limit creator revenue for foreign influencers but Musk intervenes

    March 25, 2026
    Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case

    Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case

    March 25, 2026
    The United States router ban, explained

    The United States router ban, explained

    March 25, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Cox Communications not liable for pirated music, Supreme Court rules
    News

    Cox Communications not liable for pirated music, Supreme Court rules

    News RoomBy News RoomMarch 25, 20262 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Cox Communications not liable for pirated music, Supreme Court rules

    The Supreme Court has issued its ruling in a lengthy copyright battle between Cox Communications and major record labels, determining that the cable and internet service provider isn’t responsible for illegally downloaded music, as reported earlier by the Associated Press. The unanimous decision says Cox “neither induced its users’ infringement nor provided a service tailored to infringement.”

    Several record labels, led by Sony Music, sued Cox in 2018, alleging the company allowed 60,000 internet subscribers to download over 10,000 copyrighted songs illegally. A jury found Cox liable for piracy in 2019 and granted Sony $1 billion in damages, though an appeals court later tossed out the hefty award. Cox asked the Supreme Court to take up its case in August 2024.

    Other ISPs, such as AT&T and Verizon, backed Cox during the fight, saying the appeals court’s decision “threatens to saddle internet service providers with responsibility for virtually every bad act.” The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) also said punishing an ISP like Cox will hurt free speech.

    “A company is not liable as a copyright infringer for merely providing a service to the general public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights,” Justice Clarence Thomas writes in his opinion. “Cox simply provided Internet access, which is used for many purposes other than copyright infringement.”

    Mitch Glazier, the chairman and CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America, says that the trade organization is “disappointed in the Court’s decision,” adding that “copyright law must protect creators and markets from harmful infringement and policymakers should look closely at the impact of this ruling.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleReddit accounts with ‘fishy’ bot-like behavior will soon need to prove they’re human
    Next Article The United States router ban, explained

    Related Posts

    X tries to limit creator revenue for foreign influencers but Musk intervenes

    X tries to limit creator revenue for foreign influencers but Musk intervenes

    March 25, 2026
    Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case

    Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case

    March 25, 2026
    The United States router ban, explained

    The United States router ban, explained

    March 25, 2026
    Reddit accounts with ‘fishy’ bot-like behavior will soon need to prove they’re human

    Reddit accounts with ‘fishy’ bot-like behavior will soon need to prove they’re human

    March 25, 2026
    You can install these wireless security cameras over half a mile away

    You can install these wireless security cameras over half a mile away

    March 25, 2026
    Ring finally brings 4K video to its battery-powered doorbell camera

    Ring finally brings 4K video to its battery-powered doorbell camera

    March 25, 2026
    Our Picks
    Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case

    Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case

    March 25, 2026
    The United States router ban, explained

    The United States router ban, explained

    March 25, 2026
    Cox Communications not liable for pirated music, Supreme Court rules

    Cox Communications not liable for pirated music, Supreme Court rules

    March 25, 2026
    Reddit accounts with ‘fishy’ bot-like behavior will soon need to prove they’re human

    Reddit accounts with ‘fishy’ bot-like behavior will soon need to prove they’re human

    March 25, 2026
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    You can install these wireless security cameras over half a mile away News

    You can install these wireless security cameras over half a mile away

    By News RoomMarch 25, 2026

    First announced earlier this year at CES 2026, Xthings is planning to release two new…

    Ring finally brings 4K video to its battery-powered doorbell camera

    Ring finally brings 4K video to its battery-powered doorbell camera

    March 25, 2026
    The best deals we’ve found from Amazon’s Big Spring Sale (so far)

    The best deals we’ve found from Amazon’s Big Spring Sale (so far)

    March 25, 2026
    Samsung’s Galaxy A57 gets thinner, faster, and more expensive

    Samsung’s Galaxy A57 gets thinner, faster, and more expensive

    March 25, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2026 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.