Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    X is changing how it handles links to try and keep you in the app

    October 19, 2025

    X is launching a marketplace for inactive handles

    October 19, 2025

    Time to catch ‘em all again

    October 19, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Craig Wright Claims He’s Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto. Can He Prove It in Court?
    Business

    Craig Wright Claims He’s Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto. Can He Prove It in Court?

    News RoomBy News RoomFebruary 2, 20243 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    Satoshi Nakamoto is the founding father of cryptocurrency—and a mystery.

    In October 2008, Nakamoto gave Bitcoin to the world. Then they disappeared. To this day, nobody knows who Nakamoto is. Amongst the speculation, one man stepped forward: Craig Wright, an Australian computer scientist who has, since 2016, maintained that he is Nakamoto. Now he’ll have to prove it in court.

    On February 5, a trial will begin in the UK High Court, the purpose of which is to challenge Wright’s claim to Satoshi-hood. The case is being brought by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a nonprofit consortium of crypto and tech firms, in response to a slew of lawsuits filed by Wright against Bitcoin developers and other parties, in which he is trying to assert intellectual property rights over Bitcoin as its ostensible creator.

    In its complaint, COPA claims that Wright’s behavior has had a “chilling effect,” obstructing the progress of Bitcoin by scaring away developers. It is seeking a declaration that Wright does not own the copyright to the white paper that first proposed Bitcoin and did not author the original code, and an injunction preventing him from saying otherwise. In effect, COPA is asking the court to rule that Wright is not Nakamoto.

    The verdict will have direct implications for a tangle of interlocking cases, which will determine whether Wright can prevent developers from working on Bitcoin without his permission and dictate the terms under which the Bitcoin system can be used.

    “The stakes are very high,” says a representative of the Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund, a nonprofit that helps Bitcoin developers defend against legal action, who asked to remain nameless for fear of legal retaliation from Wright. “In the eyes of the law,” they claim, Wright “is asking for ultimate control over the Bitcoin network.”

    Wright declined to be interviewed for this story.

    In their 2008 white paper, released in the shadow of a global financial meltdown, Nakamoto sketched a vision for a new electronic money and peer-to-peer payment system that would obviate the need for troublesome intermediaries like banks. In January 2009, they sent the first Bitcoin transaction. A little more than two years later, they disappeared without a trace. The hunt for Nakamoto began.

    The absence of a “leader,” says software developer and early Bitcoin adopter Jameson Lopp, has been an asset to Bitcoin in the period since, making it “robust” by demanding it evolve under a system of unspoiled anarchy. Free from the overbearing influence of a founder, anyone that volunteered their time to work on Bitcoin could have a say in its direction. Yet Wright’s claim to be Nakamoto threatens to complicate matters.

    Wright was first nominated as a potential candidate by both WIRED and Gizmodo on the same day in December 2015. The original story, based on a trove of leaked documents, proposed that Wright had “either invented Bitcoin or is a brilliant hoaxer who very badly wants us to believe he did.” A few days later, WIRED published a second story, pointing to discrepancies in the evidence that supported the latter interpretation.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleVision Pro launch: all the news about Apple’s pricey new headset
    Next Article Indie labels cry foul over Apple Music’s enhanced spatial audio royalties

    Related Posts

    Spit On, Sworn At, and Undeterred: What It’s Like to Own a Cybertruck

    October 17, 2025

    The AI Industry’s Scaling Obsession Is Headed for a Cliff

    October 17, 2025

    A Plan to Rebuild Gaza Lists Nearly 30 Companies. Many Say They’re Not Involved

    October 16, 2025

    Feds Seize Record-Breaking $15 Billion in Bitcoin From Alleged Scam Empire

    October 16, 2025

    ‘Sovereign AI’ Has Become a New Front in the US-China Tech War

    October 15, 2025

    Mark Cuban Would Still Have Dinner With Donald Trump

    October 14, 2025
    Our Picks

    X is launching a marketplace for inactive handles

    October 19, 2025

    Time to catch ‘em all again

    October 19, 2025

    The Sony Watchman was must-see TV

    October 19, 2025

    This weekend is your last chance to get a month of Disney Plus starting at $9.99

    October 19, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Opera’s Neon shows just how confusing AI browsers still are

    By News RoomOctober 19, 2025

    The trick to understanding Opera’s Neon browser is recognizing that it’s not just a browser…

    The AI sexting era has arrived

    October 19, 2025

    8BitDo’s new collection celebrates the NES’s 40th anniversary

    October 18, 2025

    TiVo won the court battles, but lost the TV war

    October 18, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.