Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    X is changing how it handles links to try and keep you in the app

    October 19, 2025

    X is launching a marketplace for inactive handles

    October 19, 2025

    Time to catch ‘em all again

    October 19, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » How One Author Pushed the Limits of AI Copyright
    Business

    How One Author Pushed the Limits of AI Copyright

    News RoomBy News RoomApril 18, 20244 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    “I’m going to take this as a win for now,” Shupe says, even though she knows that “in some ways, it’s a compromise.” She maintains that the way she uses ChatGPT more closely resembles a collaboration than an automated output, and that she should be able to copyright the actual text of the book.

    Matthew Sag, a professor of law and artificial intelligence at Emory University, calls what the USCO granted Shupe “thin copyright”—protection against full-fledged duplication of materials that doesn’t stop someone from rearranging the paragraphs into a different story. “This is the same kind of copyright you would get in an anthology of poetry that you didn’t write,” Sag says.

    Erica Van Loon agrees. “It’s hard to imagine something more narrow,” she says.

    Shupe is part of a larger movement to make copyright law friendlier to AI and the people who use it. The Copyright Office, which both administers the copyright registration system and advises Congress, the judiciary system, and other governmental agencies on copyright matters, plays a central role in determining how works that use AI are treated.

    Although it continues to define authorship as an exclusively human endeavor, the USCO has demonstrated openness to registering works that incorporate AI elements. The USCO said in February that it has granted registration to over 100 works with AI incorporated; a search by WIRED found over 200 copyright registration applications explicitly disclosing AI elements, including books, songs, and visual artworks.

    One such application came from Tyler Partin, who works for a chemical manufacturer. He recently registered a tongue-in-cheek song he created about a coworker, but excluded lyrics that he spun up using ChatGPT from his registration. Partin sees the text generator as a tool, but ultimately doesn’t think he should take credit for its output. Instead, he applied only for the music rather than the accompanying words. “I didn’t do that work,” he says.

    But there are others who share Shupe’s perspective and agree with her mission, and believe that AI-generated materials should be registrable. Some high-profile attempts to register AI-generated artworks have resulted in USCO refusals, like artist Matthew Allen’s effort to get his award-winning artwork Théâtre D’opéra Spatial copyrighted last year. AI researcher Stephen Thaler has been on a mission for years to prove that the AI system he invented deserves copyright protections of its own.

    Thaler is currently appealing a ruling in the US last year that rebuffed his attempt to obtain copyright on behalf of his machine. Ryan Abbott, the lead attorney on the case, founded the Artificial Inventor Project, a group of intellectual property lawyers who file test cases seeking legal protections for AI-generated works.

    Abbott is a supporter of Shupe’s mission, although he’s not a member of her legal team. He isn’t happy that the copyright registration excludes the AI-generated work itself. “We all see it as a very big problem,” he says.

    Shupe and her legal helpers don’t have plans to push the ADA argument further by contesting the USCO’s decision, but it’s an issue that is far from settled. “The best path is probably to lobby Congress for an addition to the ADA statute,” says Askin. “There’s a potential for us to draft some legislation or testimony to try to move Congress in that direction.”

    Shupe’s qualified victory is still a significant marker in how the Copyright Office is grappling with what it means to be an author in the age of AI. She hopes going public with her efforts will reduce what she sees as a stigma against using AI as a creative tool. Her metaphorical nuke didn’t go off, but she has nonetheless advanced her cause. “I haven’t been this excited since I unboxed a Commodore 64 back in the 1980s and, after a lot of noise, connected to a distant computer,” she says.

    Updated 17-4-2024, 4:35 pm EDT: President Biden’s executive order on AI last year asked the US Patent and Trademark office to make recommendations on copyright and AI in consultation with the Copyright Office, it did not ask the Copyright Office itself to make the recommendations.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleSamsung’s Galaxy Book4 Ultra Is the Laptop to Beat When It Comes to Power
    Next Article Samsung shifts executives to six-day workweeks to “inject a sense of crisis”

    Related Posts

    Spit On, Sworn At, and Undeterred: What It’s Like to Own a Cybertruck

    October 17, 2025

    The AI Industry’s Scaling Obsession Is Headed for a Cliff

    October 17, 2025

    A Plan to Rebuild Gaza Lists Nearly 30 Companies. Many Say They’re Not Involved

    October 16, 2025

    Feds Seize Record-Breaking $15 Billion in Bitcoin From Alleged Scam Empire

    October 16, 2025

    ‘Sovereign AI’ Has Become a New Front in the US-China Tech War

    October 15, 2025

    Mark Cuban Would Still Have Dinner With Donald Trump

    October 14, 2025
    Our Picks

    X is launching a marketplace for inactive handles

    October 19, 2025

    Time to catch ‘em all again

    October 19, 2025

    The Sony Watchman was must-see TV

    October 19, 2025

    This weekend is your last chance to get a month of Disney Plus starting at $9.99

    October 19, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Opera’s Neon shows just how confusing AI browsers still are

    By News RoomOctober 19, 2025

    The trick to understanding Opera’s Neon browser is recognizing that it’s not just a browser…

    The AI sexting era has arrived

    October 19, 2025

    8BitDo’s new collection celebrates the NES’s 40th anniversary

    October 18, 2025

    TiVo won the court battles, but lost the TV war

    October 18, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.