Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Disney Just Threw a Punch in a Major AI Fight

    June 27, 2025

    Google’s carbon emissions just went up again

    June 27, 2025

    Eufy’s Omni C20 mopping robovac is $300 off for a limited time

    June 27, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » How the Loudest Voices in AI Went From ‘Regulate Us’ to ‘Unleash Us’
    Business

    How the Loudest Voices in AI Went From ‘Regulate Us’ to ‘Unleash Us’

    News RoomBy News RoomJune 4, 20254 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    On May 16, 2023, Sam Altman appeared before a subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary. The title of the hearing was “Oversight of AI.” The session was a lovefest, with both Altman and the senators celebrating what Altman called AI’s “printing press moment”—and acknowledging that the US needed strong laws to avoid its pitfalls. “We think that regulatory intervention by governments will be critical to mitigate the risks of increasingly powerful models,” he said. The legislators hung on Altman’s every word as he gushed about how smart laws could allow AI to flourish—but only within firm guidelines that both lawmakers and AI builders deemed vital at that moment. Altman was speaking for the industry, which widely shared his attitude. The battle cry was “Regulate Us!”

    Two years later, on May 8 of this year, Altman was back in front of another group of senators. The senators and Altman were still singing the same tune, but one pulled from a different playlist. This hearing was called “Winning the AI Race.” In DC, the word “oversight” has fallen out of favor, and the AI discourse is no exception. Instead of advocating for outside bodies to examine AI models to assess risks, or for platforms to alert people when they are interacting with AI, committee chair Ted Cruz argued for a path where the government would not only fuel innovation but remove barriers like “overregulation.” Altman was on board with that. His message was no longer “regulate me” but “invest in me.” He said that overregulation—like the rules adopted by the European Union or one bill recently vetoed in California would be “disastrous.” “We need the space to innovate and to move quickly,” he said. Safety guardrails might be necessary, he affirmed, but they needed to involve “sensible regulation that does not slow us down.”

    What happened? For one thing, the panicky moment just after everyone got freaked out by ChatGPT passed, and it became clear that Congress wasn’t going to move quickly on AI. But the biggest development is that Donald Trump took back the White House, and hit the brakes on the Biden administration’s nuanced, pro-regulation tone. The Trump doctrine of AI regulation seems suspiciously close to that of Trump supporter Marc Andreessen, who declared in his Techno Optimist Manifesto that AI regulation was literally a form of murder because “any deceleration of AI will cost lives.” Vice President J.D. Vance made these priorities explicit in an international gathering held in Paris this February. “I’m not here … to talk about AI safety, which was the title of the conference a couple of years ago,” he said. “We believe that excessive regulation of the AI sector could kill a transformative industry just as it’s taking off, and we’ll make every effort to encourage pro-growth AI policies.” The administration later unveiled an AI Action Plan “to enhance America’s position as an AI powerhouse and prevent unnecessarily burdensome requirements from hindering private sector innovation.”

    Two foes have emerged in this movement. First is the European Union which has adopted a regulatory regimen that demands transparency and accountability from major AI companies. The White House despises this approach, as do those building AI businesses in the US.

    But the biggest bogeyman is China. The prospect of the People’s Republic besting the US in the “AI Race” is so unthinkable that regulation must be put aside, or done with what both Altman and Cruz described as a “light touch.” Some of this reasoning comes from a theory known as “hard takeoff,” which posits that AI models can reach a tipping point where lightning-fast self-improvement launches a dizzying gyre of supercapability, also known as AGI. “If you get there first, you dastardly person, I will not be able to catch you,” says former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, with the “you” being a competitor (Schmidt had been speaking about China’s status as a leader in open source.) Schmidt is one of the loudest voices warning about this possible future. But the White House is probably less interested in the Singularity than it is in classic economic competition.

    The fear of China pulling ahead on AI is the key driver of current US policy, safety be damned. The party line even objects to individual states trying to fill the vacuum of inaction with laws of their own. The version of the tax-break giving, Medicaid-cutting megabill just passed by the House included a mandated moratorium on any state-level AI legislation for 10 years. That’s like eternity in terms of AI progress. (Pundits are saying that this provision won’t survive some opposition in the Senate, but it should be noted that almost every Republican in the House voted for it.)

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleAnker’s newest power station is a good mix of power and portability
    Next Article The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon

    Related Posts

    Disney Just Threw a Punch in a Major AI Fight

    June 27, 2025

    Meta Wins Blockbuster AI Copyright Case—but There’s a Catch

    June 27, 2025

    Venice Braces for Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez’s Wedding

    June 27, 2025

    AI Agents Are Getting Better at Writing Code—and Hacking It as Well

    June 26, 2025

    Anthropic Scores a Landmark AI Copyright Win—but Will Face Trial Over Piracy Claims

    June 25, 2025

    Elon Musk’s Lawyers Claim He ‘Does Not Use a Computer’

    June 25, 2025
    Our Picks

    Google’s carbon emissions just went up again

    June 27, 2025

    Eufy’s Omni C20 mopping robovac is $300 off for a limited time

    June 27, 2025

    Meta Wins Blockbuster AI Copyright Case—but There’s a Catch

    June 27, 2025

    What Meta and Anthropic really won in court

    June 27, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Adobe’s new camera app is making me rethink phone photography

    By News RoomJune 27, 2025

    Adobe’s Project Indigo is a camera app built by camera nerds for camera nerds. It’s…

    Google quietly introduced precise Bluetooth tracking on the Pixel Watch 3

    June 27, 2025

    What Satellite Images Reveal About the US Bombing of Iran’s Nuclear Sites

    June 27, 2025

    This smart smoke alarm could be a worthy Nest Protect replacement

    June 27, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.