Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Microsoft trumps Google with $30 billion investment in the UK

    September 16, 2025

    How AI Is Upending Politics, Tech, the Media, and More

    September 16, 2025

    Consumer Reports asks Microsoft to keep supporting Windows 10

    September 16, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Leak of Russian ‘Threat’ Part of a Bid to Kill US Surveillance Reform, Sources Say
    Security

    Leak of Russian ‘Threat’ Part of a Bid to Kill US Surveillance Reform, Sources Say

    News RoomBy News RoomFebruary 22, 20243 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    While redirecting blame away from Turner and his cohorts, the claim is both false and deceptive, relying on assertions that, while farcical perhaps to legal experts, would be impossible for the public at large (and most of the press) to parse alone.

    The text that Fox News’ intelligence sources are referring to—which can be read on the final page of the bill online—does nothing, in reality. It does not require or prevent anyone in the government from taking any action whatsoever. It also has no impact on FISA, the statute from which Section 702 derives its power.

    The controversial text states that the nation’s top intelligence official “may submit” information to Congress regarding how “law enforcement agencies and the intelligence community” purchase “commercially available data about United States persons.” Essentially, it grants the intelligence community permission to do something that it does not actually need permission to do.

    The language was included not to “totally screw” FISA, but to ensure that the phrase “commercially available data” appears at least once in the text, for reasons that are as benign as they are elusive to casual followers of legislative procedures.

    One of the most popular amendments suggested to the Section 702 bill, discussed openly by lawmakers for months, is one that would prevent the government from purchasing data that normally requires a warrant. To counter arguments that these purchases are unrelated (which is to say, not “germane”) to the 702 program, the language in the final section, accomplishing nothing else, was added. A placeholder, effectively.

    A senior source close to the Judiciary Committee said that it would have been impossible for Turner not to know the amendment was coming, and that the surprise expressed by his staff in the Fox News piece and elsewhere appeared to those in the know as pure theater.

    Four aides, recordings of several public hearings, and a slew of reporting confirm that Turner had been aware for weeks, if not months, that restrictions on commercially available data would be one of the key amendments offered up by Judiciary members. The aides added that he’d also privately agreed to allow Judiciary members to offer their amendments. Prior to the bill being pulled, Representatives Warren Davidson and Zoe Lofgren had issued a relevant joint statement publicly: “It makes little sense to rein in warrantless surveillance under one authority when the government can simply fall back on other available techniques to acquire similar information,” they said.

    Only after forcing Johnson to cancel the vote did the germaneness of the measure become a justification for tanking the entire process.

    “No one actually thinks the Intelligence Committee cares about this,” says an aide working for a Judiciary member. “It’s the amendment they’re freaking out about. They don’t want the intelligence community to have to ask judges before they do anything.”

    “For all the downplaying the agencies have done, telling us repeatedly they aren’t purchasing our data that often, Turner just blew weeks of negotiation to defend this one thing,” says the same aide. “To me, that says something about how much the government actually cares about this.”

    Update: 2/16/24, 3:35 pm ET: Added details about a letter calling for Turner to step down as Intel chair.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleYahoo lays off the leaders of Engadget
    Next Article Reddit is going public and inviting power users to invest

    Related Posts

    Here’s What to Know About Poland Shooting Down Russian Drones

    September 16, 2025

    Jeffrey Epstein’s Yahoo Inbox Revealed

    September 16, 2025

    Charlie Kirk Shooting Suspect Identified as 22-Year-Old Utah Man

    September 16, 2025

    A New Platform Offers Privacy Tools to Millions of Public Servants

    September 15, 2025

    Apple’s Big Bet to Eliminate the iPhone’s Most Targeted Vulnerabilities

    September 13, 2025

    Defense Department Scrambles to Pretend It’s Called the War Department

    September 12, 2025
    Our Picks

    How AI Is Upending Politics, Tech, the Media, and More

    September 16, 2025

    Consumer Reports asks Microsoft to keep supporting Windows 10

    September 16, 2025

    Can Luigi Mangione get too big to jail?

    September 16, 2025

    Hundreds of Google AI Workers Were Fired Amid Fight Over Working Conditions

    September 16, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Sam Altman says ChatGPT will stop talking about suicide with teens

    By News RoomSeptember 16, 2025

    On Tuesday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said that the company was attempting to balance privacy,…

    Charlie Kirk’s death got complicated by gamer brainrot

    September 16, 2025

    Wyze’s new palm-scanning door lock has a second, backup battery

    September 16, 2025

    Here’s What to Know About Poland Shooting Down Russian Drones

    September 16, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.