Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Why do lawyers keep using ChatGPT?

    June 1, 2025

    We Bought a ‘Peeing’ Robot Attack Dog From Temu. It Was Even Weirder Than Expected

    June 1, 2025

    Your Gmail Inbox Is Running Slow. Do These Things to Fix It

    June 1, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Music labels sue Verizon for more than $2.6 billion
    News

    Music labels sue Verizon for more than $2.6 billion

    News RoomBy News RoomJuly 15, 20242 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    Powerful record labels, including UMG Recordings, Warner Music, and Sony Music, filed a lawsuit Friday accusing Verizon of intentionally ignoring its customers’ copyright violations for profit, reports Music Business Worldwide.

    The plaintiffs say they are entitled to as much as $150,000 per violation under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which could add up to as much as $2.6 billion.

    The lawsuit includes a list of 17,335 tracks from artists or bands, including Elvis Presley, Matchbox Twenty, Goo Goo Dolls, and Brandy. (Here’s the list if you’d like to dive further in — it starts with Sam Cooke and ends with Wiz Khalifa.) The labels say they’ve sent “nearly 350,000 infringement notices” to Verizon since 2020, alleging that the company ignored people repeatedly cited for illegally sharing files because they pay more for faster, better internet service.

    Verizon’s failure to take meaningful action against its infringing subscribers drew subscribers engaging in Internet piracy to purchase Verizon’s services, so that those subscribers could infringe Plaintiffs’ (and others’) copyrights and avoid obtaining that copyrighted content through legitimate channels. Infringing subscribers were drawn to Verizon’s services both because of its lax policies concerning copyright infringement and faster internet speeds that facilitated the use of P2P protocols for those willing to pay more. Verizon fostered a safe haven for infringement in light of its lax policies and thus encouraged its subscribers to infringe. The specific infringing subscribers identified in Plaintiffs’ notices, including the particularly egregious infringers identified above, knew that Verizon would not terminate their accounts despite receiving multiple notices identifying them as infringers, and they remained Verizon subscribers so that they could continue illegally downloading copyrighted works.

    The suit charges Verizon with both contributory and vicarious copyright infringement, asking the judge to award labels the maximum penalty for every track on their list as well as attorney’s fees.

    Previous copyright battles have included Viacom vs. YouTube, with the latter arguing successfully that it qualified for the DMCA’s “Safe Harbor” provision, while a $1 billion judgment against Cox Communications was overturned on appeal with the court saying the ISP didn’t profit by ignoring music piracy.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleiOS 18 might help you rescue photos you thought were gone forever
    Next Article It’s never been easier for the cops to break into your phone

    Related Posts

    Why do lawyers keep using ChatGPT?

    June 1, 2025

    Trump pulls Musk ally’s NASA Administrator nomination

    May 31, 2025

    Sony’s DualSense Edge controller is receiving a rare $30 discount

    May 31, 2025

    Slate Auto FAQ: your questions answered

    May 31, 2025

    Twitch is getting vertical livestreams

    May 31, 2025

    OpenAI wants ChatGPT to be a ‘super assistant’ for every part of your life

    May 30, 2025
    Our Picks

    We Bought a ‘Peeing’ Robot Attack Dog From Temu. It Was Even Weirder Than Expected

    June 1, 2025

    Your Gmail Inbox Is Running Slow. Do These Things to Fix It

    June 1, 2025

    Starship’s Latest Test Reveals New Problems for SpaceX to Solve

    June 1, 2025

    Priority’s Current Plus Ebike Powers You Up the Meanest Hills

    June 1, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    Gear

    Get 20% Off with a Brooks Promo Code for June 2025

    By News RoomJune 1, 2025

    If WIRED doesn’t write about Brooks running shoes more often, it’s because they’re so good…

    Trump pulls Musk ally’s NASA Administrator nomination

    May 31, 2025

    This Staples Standing Desk Isn’t Flashy but It’s Reliable for the Money

    May 31, 2025

    The Nike x Hyperice Hyperboots Will Give You a Heated Foot Massage While You Walk

    May 31, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.