Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Epic just won its Google lawsuit again, and Android may never be the same

    July 31, 2025

    DJI won’t sell you an Osmo 360 in the US — but these retailers will

    July 31, 2025

    Reddit wants to be a search engine now

    July 31, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition review: a polarizing choice
    News

    Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition review: a polarizing choice

    News RoomBy News RoomJuly 31, 20259 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    It was a sweltering Sunday in Brooklyn. Instead of being wasteful and spending $10 on a five-minute Uber, I decided to walk the 20 minutes to a cutesy Japanese stationery cafe with an even cutesier name. Despite the 85 percent humidity, my vanity demanded I wear a full face of makeup with a snatched nose contour. Sweat was leaking out of every pore, melting said nose contour into my sunglasses. Foundation ran down my neck and stained my shirt collar. I’m pretty sure all of Williamsburg could see I had pit stains.

    So I was taken aback when a suave artiste walking a French bulldog stopped me, pointed to the Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition sunglasses on my face, and said, “Yo, those are siiick — do you love them?!”

    They proceeded to rattle off some questions. I was flabbergasted to realize this person was genuinely curious and eagerly wanted to hear my impressions. I managed a “Just got them! I think they’re cool?” before scuttling away like the awkward turtle I am.

    My flabbers were even more gasted when I realized this was the first time anyone had ever noticed that I was wearing a pair of smart glasses.

    $500

    The Good

    • Longer battery
    • Higher video resolution
    • Makes greenery look more green

    The Bad

    • Not as fashionably versatile as the Ray-Bans
    • Harder to take out of the case than the Ray-Bans
    • More expensive than the Ray-Bans
    • Basically, the Ray-Bans are a better value

    I’ve been thinking about that interaction a lot while testing the Oakley glasses. After so many years as a smart glasses skeptic, it’s wild to see how successful Meta’s been with the Ray-Bans — the Oakleys’ predecessor. EssilorLuxottica said in its earnings results earlier this week that sales have tripled year over year. And not just among techies. Among regular people. Just the other day, a friend sent me a TikTok with footage from a Stray Kids concert recorded by the Ray-Ban Meta glasses. Shoulda done this for our show, they’d texted. A quick search showed that someone at our exact show, seated not that far from us, actually had.

    When I first reviewed the Ray-Ban Meta glasses, I knew something had shifted. But it’s mind-boggling that under two years later, Meta has launched multiple limited editions and a Super Bowl commercial, let alone an option from another brand to reach new audiences.

    Where Ray-Bans are classic and versatile, Oakleys conjure images of Olympic cyclists or Coach Taylor from Friday Night Lights. The young’uns have also glommed onto the brand as Y2K fashion is all the rage again.

    Wide angle view of the Oakley Meta glasses slung in Senior Reviewer Victoria Song’s shirt, which is striped blue and pink. There is a colorful pink ice cream truck menu in the background.

    The PRIZM lenses make greenery incredibly lush and verdant.

    Stylistically, the Oakleys are more polarizing. Not just because they have PRIZM lenses, either. Both my spouse and bestie scrunched their noses at the concept of white sunglasses. Multiple friends and coworkers pointed out the slanted area by the nose bridge, asking, “Why the hell does it do that?” (The answer is that Oakley’s regular HSTN glasses do that. It’s an Oakley thing.) Anyone can rock these, provided they bring a bit of swagger. Many people won’t feel comfortable with such a bold look.

    Ironically, the Oakley case is much more boring and feels cheaper in your hand than the Meta Ray-Bans case. It’s also much harder to get the glasses out. I was afraid I’d break the charging contact while pulling them out.

    The main differences are a bump up in video resolution from 1080p to 3K, roughly double the battery to eight hours on a single charge, and Oakley’s PRIZM lenses on the limited edition. The extra battery is nice, since that’s one of the main complaints about Meta glasses for power users. Meanwhile, the PRIZM lenses enhance contrast and certain colors. It sounds like a marketing spiel, but I don’t think I’d truly experienced green until I saw the way trees and grass look through these glasses. The kicker is that all these things make the Oakleys more expensive. The standard Oakleys will start at $399, compared to $299 for the Ray-Bans. This limited edition version costs $499.

    Close up of Senior Reviewer Victoria Song taking the Oakleys out of the case, which is black and boring.

    I thought I was going to break the glasses each time I took them out of the case.

    That’s hard to swallow. I understand boosting 3K video resolution and battery life. Oakleys are more likely to appeal to outdoorsy folks. Those are the kinds of updates that crowd would want. But photo quality is identical. 3K videos are noticeably sharper, and you’d get decent action footage if you can figure out framing. (Once again, I was foiled by the corner of my baseball cap, my bangs, and a tendency to tilt my head.) Filming in 3K is a battery guzzler. Recording three 2.5-minute 3K videos of my cat and uploading them via Wi-Fi to my phone ate a whopping 20 percent of my battery.

    Our supervising video producer, Vjeran Pavic, copped a pair for himself and had the same issues with framing, but he adds that everything has a “very HDR look.” That’s not a bad thing. It’s the right move as everything needs to pop, be simple, and have consistent exposure. The benefit is hands-free, point-of-view convenience. It’s never going to trump the quality of a high-end phone or action cam.

    The Ray-Bans and Oakleys have the same number of mics and placement, but may fit your face differently. I sound clearer on calls from the Ray-Bans. The glasses have different nose pads, so because of my low nose bridge, I ended up sounding muffled on the Oakleys. You can fix this, however, in the mic troubleshooting settings.

    I know what I’d say now if I could travel back in time to that street corner in Williamsburg.

    I don’t love these glasses, Mr. Ludicrously Stylish Brooklyn Man. A more accurate answer is, I appreciate them. While they fit more easily into my life than I’d anticipated, they’re more a “nice to have” than a “must have.” As a runner, nothing will quite beat my Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 for open-ear audio, but I’ve enjoyed using these on my summer runs when the sun is punishingly bright. But the real question, sir, is how much do you like AI? How much do you trust Meta?

    These smart glasses now connect to the Meta AI app instead of the Meta View companion app. Meta purposefully calls these AI glasses, so you can rest assured that association isn’t going anywhere. There are now privacy stipulations where you can’t opt out of voice recordings being stored in the cloud, among other things. That feels… dystopian, but for the blind and low-vision community, this might be relatively small potatoes. These glasses and their Live AI features have empowered them to live more independently. For content creators, the camera and livestreaming capabilities open new creative avenues.

    I’m pretty sure my nose contour is still stuck in the nose pads.
    Photo by Amelia Holowaty Krales / The Verge

    Me, pretending I had a smart answer that day in Brooklyn instead of letting social anxiety win.
    Photo by Amelia Holowaty Krales / The Verge

    Pondering the implications that people are starting to recognize that these are smart glasses in public spaces.
    Photo by Amelia Holowaty Krales / The Verge

    If that sounds appealing, go for the Ray-Bans, because they’re more versatile for indoor and outdoor wear and are $100 to $200 less. That is, unless you’re much more of an outdoorsy or content creator type. In that case, the 3K resolution and extra battery life make more sense.

    Now, you’ll have to excuse me, Mr. Unreasonably Chic for a Heat Wave. I’m going to power-walk back to AC, put my reviewer hat back on, and ponder this conversation and what it means that you could tell I was wearing smart glasses. Hey, Meta, can you tell me where the nearest bodega is?

    Agree to Continue: Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition

    Every smart device now requires you to agree to a series of terms and conditions before you can use it — contracts that no one actually reads. It’s impossible for us to read and analyze every single one of these agreements. But we started counting exactly how many times you have to hit “agree” to use devices when we review them since these are agreements most people don’t read and definitely can’t negotiate.

    To use the Oakley Meta smart glasses, you’ll need a Meta account and the Meta AI app downloaded onto your phone. A Meta account works across platforms like Meta, Instagram, and Quest and comes with its own Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. If you want to partake in early access programs for beta AI features, that will also come with its own terms. Should you decide to integrate with services like WhatsApp, Instagram, and Spotify, you also agree to those terms and privacy policies. You may also be asked to give permissions related to Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, location services, and voice data. If you choose to get a pair of prescription lenses, you may also be asked to share that information with Lenscrafters.

    The smart glasses also come with supplemental terms of service and privacy policies / notices, including:

    You can also view all the associated AI glasses legal and privacy documentation here.

    Final tally: Two mandatory agreements, six supplemental agreements and notices, and several optional agreements.

    Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

    • Victoria Song

      Victoria Song

      Victoria Song

      Senior Reviewer, Wearable Tech

      Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

      See All by Victoria Song

    • Accessory Reviews

      Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

      See All Accessory Reviews

    • AI

      Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

      See All AI

    • Gadgets

      Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

      See All Gadgets

    • Meta

      Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

      See All Meta

    • Reviews

      Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

      See All Reviews

    • Tech

      Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

      See All Tech

    • Wearable

      Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

      See All Wearable

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleDJI’s first 360-degree camera can continuously capture 8K footage for over 100 minutes
    Next Article This Smart Basketball Tracks Data About Every Shot. It Could Be Headed to the NBA

    Related Posts

    Epic just won its Google lawsuit again, and Android may never be the same

    July 31, 2025

    DJI won’t sell you an Osmo 360 in the US — but these retailers will

    July 31, 2025

    Reddit wants to be a search engine now

    July 31, 2025

    Tim Cook says Apple is ‘open to’ AI acquisitions

    July 31, 2025

    Apple shipped its 3 billionth iPhone

    July 31, 2025

    Apple says Trump’s tariffs are adding another $1 billion to its costs

    July 31, 2025
    Our Picks

    DJI won’t sell you an Osmo 360 in the US — but these retailers will

    July 31, 2025

    Reddit wants to be a search engine now

    July 31, 2025

    Tim Cook says Apple is ‘open to’ AI acquisitions

    July 31, 2025

    Everything You Wanted to Know About China’s Auto Industry Takeover

    July 31, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Apple shipped its 3 billionth iPhone

    By News RoomJuly 31, 2025

    Apple has been the target of a fair amount of criticism over the past year,…

    Trump Ends Tariff Exemption for Small Packages

    July 31, 2025

    Apple says Trump’s tariffs are adding another $1 billion to its costs

    July 31, 2025

    US Senator Urges DHS to Probe Whether Agents Were Moved From Criminal Cases to Deportations

    July 31, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.