Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Meta is playing the AI game with house money

    July 30, 2025

    Ready or not, age verification is rolling out across the internet

    July 30, 2025

    Dropbox is shutting down its password manager

    July 30, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Perplexity Plagiarized Our Story About How Perplexity Is a Bullshit Machine
    Security

    Perplexity Plagiarized Our Story About How Perplexity Is a Bullshit Machine

    News RoomBy News RoomJune 25, 20243 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    “They’d only get in trouble if they summarized the story incorrectly and made it defamatory when it wasn’t before. That’s something that they actually would be at legal risk for, especially if they don’t credit the original source clearly enough and people can’t easily go to that source to check,” he says. “If Perplexity’s edits are what make the story defamatory, 230 doesn’t cover that, under a bunch of case law interpreting it.”

    In one case WIRED observed, Perplexity’s chatbot did falsely claim, albeit while prominently linking to the original source, that WIRED had reported that a specific police officer in California had committed a crime. (“We have been very upfront that answers will not be accurate 100% of the time and may hallucinate,” Srinivas said in response to questions for the story we ran earlier this week, “but a core aspect of our mission is to continue improving on accuracy and the user experience.”)

    “If you want to be formal,” says Grimmelmann, “I think this is a set of claims that would get past a motion to dismiss on a bunch of theories. Not saying it will win in the end, but if the facts bear out what Forbes and WIRED, the police officer—a bunch of possible plaintiffs—allege, they are the kinds of things that, if proven and other facts were bad for Perplexity, could lead to liability.”

    Not all experts agree with Grimmelmann. Pam Samuelson, professor of law and information at UC Berkeley, writes in an email that copyright infringement is “about use of another’s expression in a way that undercuts the author’s ability to get appropriate remuneration for the value of the unauthorized use. One sentence verbatim is probably not infringement.”

    Bhamati Viswanathan, a faculty fellow at New England Law, says she’s skeptical the summary passes a threshold of substantial similarity usually necessary for a successful infringement claim, though she doesn’t think that’s the end of the matter. “It certainly should not pass the sniff test,” she wrote in an email. “I would argue that it should be enough to get your case past the motion to dismiss threshold—particularly given all the signs you had of actual stuff being copied.”

    In all, though, she argues that focusing on the narrow technical merits of such claims may not be the right way to think about things, as tech companies can adjust their practices to honor the letter of dated copyright laws while still grossly violating their purpose. She believes an entirely new legal framework may be necessary to correct for market distortions and promote the underlying aims of US intellectual property law, among them to allow people to financially benefit from original creative work like journalism so that they’ll be incentivized to produce it—with, in theory, benefits to society.

    “There are, in my opinion, strong arguments to support the intuition that generative AI is predicated upon large scale copyright infringement,” she writes. “The opening ante question is, where do we go from there? And the greater question in the long run is, how do we ensure that creators and creative economies survive? Ironically, AI is teaching us that creativity is more valuable and in demand than ever. But even as we recognize this, we see the potential for undermining, and ultimately eviscerating, the ecosystems that enable creators to make a living from their work. That’s the conundrum we need to solve—not eventually, but now.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleHow to Exercise Safely During a Heat Wave
    Next Article Tesla Cybertuck recalled again, this time over faulty wiper and trim

    Related Posts

    Microsoft Put Older Versions of SharePoint on Life Support. Hackers Are Taking Advantage

    July 29, 2025

    DHS Faces New Pressure Over DNA Taken From Immigrant Children

    July 25, 2025

    At Least 750 US Hospitals Faced Disruptions During Last Year’s CrowdStrike Outage, Study Finds

    July 24, 2025

    China’s Salt Typhoon Hackers Breached the US National Guard for Nearly a Year

    July 23, 2025

    How China’s Patriotic ‘Honkers’ Became the Nation’s Elite Cyberspies

    July 21, 2025

    Hackers Are Finding New Ways to Hide Malware in DNS Records

    July 19, 2025
    Our Picks

    Ready or not, age verification is rolling out across the internet

    July 30, 2025

    Dropbox is shutting down its password manager

    July 30, 2025

    Spotify’s terrible privacy settings just leaked Palmer Luckey’s bops and bangers

    July 30, 2025

    Microsoft reports strong cloud earnings, with Windows and Xbox up too

    July 30, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Layoffs hit CNET as its parent company goes on a buying spree

    By News RoomJuly 30, 2025

    Ziff Davis, the media conglomerate that owns outlets like CNET, ZDNET, PCMag, and Mashable is…

    How Do You Live a Happier Life? Notice What Was There All Along

    July 30, 2025

    Microsoft is getting ready for GPT-5 with a new Copilot smart mode

    July 30, 2025

    Google is using AI age checks to lock down user accounts

    July 30, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.