Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    OpenAI Leadership Responds to Meta Offers: ‘Someone Has Broken Into Our Home’

    June 30, 2025

    Microsoft Authenticator is ending support for passwords

    June 30, 2025

    AT&T says ‘our network’ wasn’t to blame for Trump’s troubled conference call

    June 30, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Project 2025 Would Drastically Cut Support for Carbon Removal
    Science

    Project 2025 Would Drastically Cut Support for Carbon Removal

    News RoomBy News RoomSeptember 20, 20243 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    That’s why government support like the DOE Regional DAC Hubs program is so important, says Jack Andreasen at Breakthrough Energy, the Bill Gates–founded initiative to accelerate technology to reach net zero. “This gets projects built,” he says. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law signed in 2021 set aside $3.5 billion in federal funds to help the construction of four regional DAC hubs. This is the money that is going into the Louisiana and Texas projects.

    Climeworks is one of the companies working on the Louisiana DAC hub, which is eligible for up to $550 million in federal funding. Eventually, the facility aims to capture more than 1 million tons of carbon dioxide each year and store it underground. “If you do want to build an industry, you cannot do it with demo projects. You have to put your money where your mouth is and say there are certain projects that should be eligible for a larger share of funding,” says Daniel Nathan, chief project development officer at Climeworks. When the hub starts sequestering carbon, it will be eligible to claim up to $180 for each ton of carbon stored, under tax credit 45Q, which was extended under the Inflation Reduction Act.

    These tax credits are important because they provide long-term support for companies actually sequestering carbon from the atmosphere. “What you have is a guaranteed revenue stream of $180 per ton for a minimum of 12 years,” says Andreasen. It’s particularly critical given that the costs of capturing and storing a ton of carbon dioxide are likely to exceed the market rate of carbon credits for a long time. Other forms of carbon removal, notably planting forests, are much cheaper than DAC, and removal offsets also compete with offsets for renewable energy, which avoid emitting new emissions. Without a top-up from the government, it’s unlikely that a market for DAC sequestration would be able to sustain itself.

    Most of the DAC industry experts WIRED spoke to thought there was little political appetite to reverse the 45Q tax credit—not least because it also allows firms to claim a tax credit for using carbon dioxide to physically extract more oil from existing reservoirs. They were more worried, however, about the prospect that existing DOE funds set aside for DAC and other projects might not be allocated under a future administration.

    “I do think a slowing down of the DOE is a possibility,” says Andreasen. “That just means the money takes longer to get out, and that is not great.” Katie Lebling at the World Resources Institute, a sustainability nonprofit, agrees, saying there is a risk that unallocated funds could be slowed down and stalled if a new administration looked less favorably on carbon removal.

    The Heritage Foundation doesn’t just doubt the carbon removal industry—it is openly skeptical about climate change, writing in one report that observed warming could only “theoretically” be due to the burning of fossil fuels, and that “this claim cannot be demonstrated through science.” In its Project 2025 plan, the foundation says the “government should not be picking winners and losers and should not be subsidizing the private sector to bring resources to market.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleThe United Nations Wants to Treat AI With the Same Urgency as Climate Change
    Next Article Why Threads Is All the Rage Bait

    Related Posts

    ‘They’re Not Breathing’: Inside the Chaos of ICE Detention Center 911 Calls

    June 29, 2025

    The FDA Just Approved a Long-Lasting Injection to Prevent HIV

    June 28, 2025

    Scientists Are Sending Cannabis Seeds to Space

    June 27, 2025

    How the Universe and Its Mirrored Version Are Different

    June 25, 2025

    Scientists Discover the Key to Axolotls’ Ability to Regenerate Limbs

    June 25, 2025

    ‘Major Anomaly’ Behind Latest SpaceX Starship Explosion

    June 23, 2025
    Our Picks

    Microsoft Authenticator is ending support for passwords

    June 30, 2025

    AT&T says ‘our network’ wasn’t to blame for Trump’s troubled conference call

    June 30, 2025

    The government’s Apple antitrust lawsuit is still on

    June 30, 2025

    Apple’s AI Siri might be powered by OpenAI

    June 30, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    Reviews

    The best Switch 2 screen protector you should buy

    By News RoomJune 30, 2025

    All of the protectors in this buying guide claim to be a 9 on the…

    The Nintendo Switch 2 will be available in-store at Best Buy on July 1st

    June 30, 2025

    Telegram Purged Chinese Crypto Scam Markets—Then Watched as They Rebuilt

    June 30, 2025

    Mark Zuckerberg announces his AI ‘superintelligence’ super-group

    June 30, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.