Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    How to Use Markdown

    July 1, 2025

    The Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 Is the Best Chromebook Ever Made

    July 1, 2025

    Cloudflare will now block AI crawlers by default

    July 1, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Reduce AI Hallucinations With This Neat Software Trick
    Gear

    Reduce AI Hallucinations With This Neat Software Trick

    News RoomBy News RoomJune 14, 20243 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    To start off, not all RAGs are of the same caliber. The accuracy of the content in the custom database is critical for solid outputs, but that isn’t the only variable. “It’s not just the quality of the content itself,” says Joel Hron, a global head of AI at Thomson Reuters. “It’s the quality of the search, and retrieval of the right content based on the question.” Mastering each step in the process is critical since one misstep can throw the model completely off.

    “Any lawyer who’s ever tried to use a natural language search within one of the research engines will see that there are often instances where semantic similarity leads you to completely irrelevant materials,” says Daniel Ho, a Stanford professor and senior fellow at the Institute for Human-Centered AI. Ho’s research into AI legal tools that rely on RAG found a higher rate of mistakes in outputs than the companies building the models found.

    Which brings us to the thorniest question in the discussion: How do you define hallucinations within a RAG implementation? Is it only when the chatbot generates a citation-less output and makes up information? Is it also when the tool may overlook relevant data or misinterpret aspects of a citation?

    According to Lewis, hallucinations in a RAG system boil down to whether the output is consistent with what’s found by the model during data retrieval. Though, the Stanford research into AI tools for lawyers broadens this definition a bit by examining whether the output is grounded in the provided data as well as whether it’s factually correct—a high bar for legal professionals who are often parsing complicated cases and navigating complex hierarchies of precedent.

    While a RAG system attuned to legal issues is clearly better at answering questions on case law than OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Google’s Gemini, it can still overlook the finer details and make random mistakes. All of the AI experts I spoke with emphasized the continued need for thoughtful, human interaction throughout the process to double check citations and verify the overall accuracy of the results.

    Law is an area where there’s a lot of activity around RAG-based AI tools, but the process’s potential is not limited to a single white-collar job. “Take any profession or any business. You need to get answers that are anchored on real documents,” says Arredondo. “So, I think RAG is going to become the staple that is used across basically every professional application, at least in the near to mid-term.” Risk-averse executives seem excited about the prospect of using AI tools to better understand their proprietary data without having to upload sensitive info to a standard, public chatbot.

    It’s critical, though, for users to understand the limitations of these tools, and for AI-focused companies to refrain from overpromising the accuracy of their answers. Anyone using an AI tool should still avoid trusting the output entirely, and they should approach its answers with a healthy sense of skepticism even if the answer is improved through RAG.

    “Hallucinations are here to stay,” says Ho. “We do not yet have ready ways to really eliminate hallucinations.” Even when RAG reduces the prevalence of errors, human judgment reigns paramount. And that’s no lie.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleLet’s speculate wildly about Tesla’s three mystery vehicles
    Next Article Apple gives Apple Home users something they’ve been begging for

    Related Posts

    How to Use Markdown

    July 1, 2025

    The Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 Is the Best Chromebook Ever Made

    July 1, 2025

    Save 20% With VistaPrint Coupons for July 2025

    July 1, 2025

    Kick Off Summer Vibes With Our Favorite Outdoor Lights

    June 30, 2025

    Plantaform’s Smart Indoor Fogponics Garden System Is Innovative, but Is It Safe?

    June 30, 2025

    Faithful Companions: The Best Printers We’ve Tried

    June 29, 2025
    Our Picks

    The Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 Is the Best Chromebook Ever Made

    July 1, 2025

    Cloudflare will now block AI crawlers by default

    July 1, 2025

    Microsoft Says Its New AI System Diagnosed Patients 4 Times More Accurately Than Human Doctors

    July 1, 2025

    Tinder’s mandatory facial recognition check comes to the US

    July 1, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    Gear

    Save 20% With VistaPrint Coupons for July 2025

    By News RoomJuly 1, 2025

    VistaPrint specializes in custom physical and digital marketing products for small businesses, like brochures and…

    OpenAI Leadership Responds to Meta Offers: ‘Someone Has Broken Into Our Home’

    June 30, 2025

    Microsoft Authenticator is ending support for passwords

    June 30, 2025

    AT&T says ‘our network’ wasn’t to blame for Trump’s troubled conference call

    June 30, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.