Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Microsoft gave Perfect Dark’s developers a chance to save the game — after it was already canceled

    September 2, 2025

    Google critics think the search remedies ruling is a total whiff

    September 2, 2025

    Google gets to keep Chrome, judge rules in search antitrust case

    September 2, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » The $2.3 Billion Tornado Cash Case Is a Pivotal Moment for Crypto Privacy
    Business

    The $2.3 Billion Tornado Cash Case Is a Pivotal Moment for Crypto Privacy

    News RoomBy News RoomMay 14, 20243 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    In the conclusion of that same statement to the court, they point out that under Dutch law the maximum prison sentence for money laundering at the scale Pertsev allegedly committed is eight years, and they ask that Pertsev be sentenced to five years and four months if he’s found guilty.

    The Tornado Rolls On

    Cryptocurrency advocates focused on privacy and civil liberties will be closely watching the outcome of Pertsev’s case, which many see as a bellwether for how Western law enforcement and regulators will draw the line between financial privacy and money laundering—including in some immediate cases to follow.

    The US trial of Tornado Cash’s Storm in a New York court later this year, as well as the US indictment last month of the founders of Samourai Wallet, which prosecutors say offered similar privacy properties to Tornado Cash’s, are more likely to directly set precedents in US law. But Pertsev’s case may suggest the direction those cases will take, says Alex Gladstein, the chief strategy officer for the Human Rights Foundation and an advocate of bitcoin’s use as a human rights tool.

    “What happens in the Netherlands will color the New York case, and the Tornado Cash cases are really going to color the outcome of the Samourai case,” Gladstein says. “These cases are going to be historic in the precedents they set.”

    Gladstein, like many crypto privacy supporters, argues that anyone weighing the value of tools like Tornado Cash should look beyond its use by hackers to countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and India, where activists and dissidents need to hide their financial transactions from repressive governments. “For human rights activists, it’s essential that they have money the government can’t surveil,” Gladstein says.

    Regardless of the verdict in Pertsev’s case or that of his cofounder Roman Storm in the fall, Tornado Cash’s founder’s core argument—that Tornado Cash’s underlying infrastructure has always been out of their hands—has proven to be correct: Tornado Cash lives on.

    True to its promise of decentralization, Tornado Cash still persists after its cofounders indictment in the fall of last year—and is now out of their control. In March, $283 million flowed into the service.

    Courtesy of Chainalysis

    When the tool’s centralized web-based interface went offline last year in the wake of US sanctions and the two cofounders’ arrests—Roman Semenov, for now, remains free—Tornado Cash transactions dropped by close to 90 percent, according to Chainalysis. But Tornado Cash has remained online, still functioning as a decentralized smart contract. In recent months, Chainalysis has seen its use tick up again intermittently. More than $283 million flowed into the service just in March.

    In other words, whether it represents a public utility for financial privacy and freedom or an uncontrollable money laundering machine, its creators’ claim has borne out: Tornado Cash remains beyond their control—or anyone’s.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleDyson’s WashG1 Is an All-in-One Wet Floor Cleaner That Doesn’t Use Suction
    Next Article Dune: Part Two starts streaming on Max next week

    Related Posts

    Big Tech Companies in the US Have Been Told Not to Apply the Digital Services Act

    September 2, 2025

    Scientists Are Flocking to Bluesky

    September 2, 2025

    Why China Builds Faster Than the Rest of the World

    September 1, 2025

    Anthropic Settles High-Profile AI Copyright Lawsuit Brought by Book Authors

    August 28, 2025

    Alexis Ohanian’s Next Social Platform Has One Rule: Don’t Act Like an Asshole

    August 27, 2025

    AI Is Eliminating Jobs for Younger Workers

    August 26, 2025
    Our Picks

    Google critics think the search remedies ruling is a total whiff

    September 2, 2025

    Google gets to keep Chrome, judge rules in search antitrust case

    September 2, 2025

    Amazon’s Lens Live AI shops for anything you can see

    September 2, 2025

    Google and Apple’s $20 billion search deal survives

    September 2, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Why the Democrats suck at countering MAGA influencers

    By News RoomSeptember 2, 2025

    Hello and welcome to Regulator. Today, I will attempt to regulate my own apoplexy.Recently, Wired…

    The tariff apocalypse is here

    September 2, 2025

    Google is having ‘productive discussions’ with Trump lawyers about his deplatforming suit

    September 2, 2025

    Tesla’s new ‘Master Plan’ sounds like AI slop

    September 2, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.