Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Klarna’s CEO is now taking your calls — over an AI hotline

    June 12, 2025

    You can own a functional version of Jeff Koons’ Balloon Dog sculptures for $750

    June 11, 2025

    Apple Home is expanding its energy management features 

    June 11, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » The Mystery of iPhone Crashes That Apple Denies Are Linked to Chinese Hacking
    Security

    The Mystery of iPhone Crashes That Apple Denies Are Linked to Chinese Hacking

    News RoomBy News RoomJune 10, 20254 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    All of that would represent a serious threat to national security. Except that, strangely, Apple flatly denies it happened. “We strongly disagree with the claims of a targeted attack against our users,” Apple’s head of security engineering, Ivan Krstić, wrote in a statement to WIRED. Apple has patched the issue that iVerify highlighted in its report, which caused iPhones to crash in certain cases when a message sender changed their own nickname and avatar. But it calls those crashes the result of a “conventional software bug,” not evidence of a targeted exploitation. (That blanket denial certainly isn’t Apple’s usual response to confirmed iPhone hacking. The company has, for instance, sued hacking firm NSO group for its targeting of Apple customers.)

    The result is that what might have been a four-alarm fire in the counterintelligence world is reduced—for now—to a very troubling enigma.

    A 22-year-old former intern at the Heritage Foundation with no national security experience has reportedly been appointed to a key Department of Homeland Security role overseeing a major program designed to combat domestic terrorism.

    According to Propublica, Thomas Fugate last month assumed leadership of the Center for Programs and Partnerships (CP3), a DHS office tasked with funding nationwide efforts to prevent politically motivated violence—including school shootings and other forms of domestic terrorism.

    Fugate, a 2024 graduate of the University of Texas at San Antonio, replaced the former CP3 director, Bill Braniff, an Army veteran with 20 years of national security experience who resigned in March following staff cuts ordered by the Trump administration.

    According to CP3’s most recent report to Congress, the office has funded more than 1,100 initiatives aimed at disrupting violent extremism. In recent months, the US has seen a string of high-profile targeted attacks, including a car bombing in California and the shooting of two Israeli Embassy aids in Washington, DC. Its $18 million grant program, designed to support local prevention efforts, is reportedly now under Fugate’s supervision.

    Hacker group names have long been an unavoidable absurdity in the cybersecurity industry. Every threat intelligence company, in a scientifically defensible attempt to not make any assumption that they’re tracking the same hackers as another firm, comes up with their own code name for any group they observe. The result is a somewhat silly profusion of overlapping naming systems based on elements, weather, and zoology: “Fancy Bear” is “Forest Blizzard” is “APT28” is “Strontium.” Now, several major threat intelligence players, including Google, Microsoft, CrowdStrike, and Palo Alto Networks, have finally shared enough of their internal research to agree to a glossary that confirms that they’re referring to the same entities. The companies did not, however, agree to consolidate their naming systems into a single taxonomy. So this agreement doesn’t mean the end of sentences in security reporting such as “the hacker group Sandworm, also known as Telebots, Voodoo Bear, Hades, Iron Viking, Electrum, or Seashell Blizzard.” It just means we cybersecurity reporters can write that sentence with a little more confidence.

    Chris Wade, the founder and CTO of mobile device reverse-engineering company Corellium, has had a wild last few decades: In 2005, he was convicted on criminal charges of enabling spammers by providing them proxy servers, and agreed to work undercover for law enforcement while avoiding prison. Then in 2020, he mysteriously received a pardon from President Donald Trump. He also settled a major copyright lawsuit from Apple. Now his company, which creates virtual images of Android and iOS devices so that customers can find ways to break into them, is being acquired by phone-hacking firm Cellebrite, a major law enforcement contractor, for $200 million—a significant payday for a hacker who has found himself on both sides of the law.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleWhy Silicon Valley Needs Immigration
    Next Article Hang on, did the iPad just become a computer?

    Related Posts

    The US Is Storing Migrant Children’s DNA in a Criminal Database

    June 11, 2025

    Ross Ulbricht Got a $31 Million Donation From a Dark Web Dealer, Crypto Tracers Suspect

    June 10, 2025

    A Researcher Figured Out How to Reveal Any Phone Number Linked to a Google Account

    June 10, 2025

    Cybercriminals Are Hiding Malicious Web Traffic in Plain Sight

    June 9, 2025

    ICE Quietly Scales Back Rules for Courthouse Raids

    June 9, 2025

    What Really Happened in the Aftermath of the Lizard Squad Hacks

    June 7, 2025
    Our Picks

    You can own a functional version of Jeff Koons’ Balloon Dog sculptures for $750

    June 11, 2025

    Apple Home is expanding its energy management features 

    June 11, 2025

    Google will reduce Pixel 6A battery capacity due to overheating issues

    June 11, 2025

    Reddit is looking for a new product boss

    June 11, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    Business

    A Google Shareholder Is Suing the Company Over the TikTok Ban

    By News RoomJune 11, 2025

    Tan, who declined to say whether he personally supports the TikTok ban, believes the central…

    Meta’s new AI video tool can put you in a desert (or at least try to)

    June 11, 2025

    The US Is Storing Migrant Children’s DNA in a Criminal Database

    June 11, 2025

    Inside the AI Party at the End of the World

    June 11, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.