Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    How Apple’s New Spotlight Compares to Raycast

    July 31, 2025

    Uber Eats is adding AI to menus, food photos, and reviews

    July 31, 2025

    Hey Microsoft, is it “Xbox PC” or “Xbox on PC”?

    July 31, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » The Study That Called Out Black Plastic Utensils Had a Major Math Error
    Science

    The Study That Called Out Black Plastic Utensils Had a Major Math Error

    News RoomBy News RoomDecember 20, 20243 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    Editors of the environmental chemistry journal Chemosphere have posted an eye-catching correction to a study reporting that toxic flame retardants from electronics wind up in some household products made of black plastic, including kitchen utensils. The study sparked a flurry of media reports a few weeks ago that urgently implored people to ditch their kitchen spatulas and spoons. Wirecutter even offered a buying guide for what to replace them with.

    The correction, posted Sunday, will likely take some heat off the beleaguered utensils. The authors made a math error that put the estimated risk from kitchen utensils off by an order of magnitude.

    Specifically, the authors estimated that if a kitchen utensil contained middling levels of a key toxic flame retardant (BDE-209), the utensil would transfer 34,700 nanograms of the contaminant a day based on regular use while cooking and serving hot food. The authors then compared that estimate to a reference level of BDE-209 considered safe by the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA’s safe level is 7,000 ng—per kilogram of body weight—per day, and the authors used 60 kg as the adult weight (about 132 pounds) for their estimate. So, the safe EPA limit would be 7,000 multiplied by 60, yielding 420,000 ng per day. That’s 12 times more than the estimated exposure of 34,700 ng per day.

    However, the authors missed a zero and reported the EPA’s safe limit as 42,000 ng per day for a 60 kg adult. The error made it seem like the estimated exposure was nearly at the safe limit, even though it was actually less than a tenth of the limit.

    “We miscalculated the reference dose for a 60 kg adult, initially estimating it at 42,000 ng/day instead of the correct value of 420,000 ng/day,” the correction reads. “As a result, we revised our statement from ‘the calculated daily intake would approach the U.S. BDE-209 reference dose’ to ‘the calculated daily intake remains an order of magnitude lower than the U.S. BDE-209 reference dose.’ We regret this error and have updated it in our manuscript.”

    Unchanged Conclusion

    While being off by an order of magnitude seems like a significant error, the authors don’t seem to think it changes anything. “This calculation error does not affect the overall conclusion of the paper,” the correction reads. The corrected study still ends by saying that the flame retardants “significantly contaminate” the plastic products, which have “high exposure potential.”

    Ars has reached out to the lead author, Megan Liu, but has not received a response. Liu works for the environmental health advocacy group Toxic-Free Future, which led the study.

    The study highlighted that flame retardants used in plastic electronics may, in some instances, be recycled into household items.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleApple begins pulling iPhone SE, 14, and 14 Plus from EU
    Next Article Every AI Copyright Lawsuit in the US, Visualized

    Related Posts

    How Do You Live a Happier Life? Notice What Was There All Along

    July 30, 2025

    EPA Employees Still in the Dark as Agency Dismantles Scientific Research Office

    July 30, 2025

    This Star System Contains 5 Potentially Habitable Planets

    July 30, 2025

    The Hunt for a Fundamental Theory of Quantum Gravity

    July 29, 2025

    South Korea Plans to Build a Base on the Moon

    July 29, 2025

    The First Planned Migration of an Entire Country Is Underway

    July 29, 2025
    Our Picks

    Uber Eats is adding AI to menus, food photos, and reviews

    July 31, 2025

    Hey Microsoft, is it “Xbox PC” or “Xbox on PC”?

    July 31, 2025

    15% Off Theragun Promo Code for August 2025

    July 31, 2025

    Meta is playing the AI game with house money

    July 30, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Ready or not, age verification is rolling out across the internet

    By News RoomJuly 30, 2025

    On July 25th, the UK became one of the first countries to widely implement age…

    Dropbox is shutting down its password manager

    July 30, 2025

    Spotify’s terrible privacy settings just leaked Palmer Luckey’s bops and bangers

    July 30, 2025

    Microsoft reports strong cloud earnings, with Windows and Xbox up too

    July 30, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.