Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot
    Blink bumps its budget buzzer to 2K

    Blink bumps its budget buzzer to 2K

    May 6, 2026
    Google’s AI search summaries will now quote Reddit

    Google’s AI search summaries will now quote Reddit

    May 6, 2026
    Energizer’s new coin batteries won’t cause ingestion burns if swallowed

    Energizer’s new coin batteries won’t cause ingestion burns if swallowed

    May 6, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Twitter’s music label legal trouble might have legs
    News

    Twitter’s music label legal trouble might have legs

    News RoomBy News RoomMarch 5, 20242 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Twitter’s music label legal trouble might have legs

    The music labels suing Twitter — now X — for copyright infringement can move forward with parts of their lawsuit. In a filing on Tuesday, US District Judge Aleta A. Trauger partially denied X’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit, saying it’s still not clear “to what extent X Corp. may be liable for the infringing acts of users on its platform.”

    Last year, the National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) sued X for $250 million on behalf of Universal Music Group, Concord Music Group, Sony Music Publishing, Warner Chappell Music, and other major publishers.

    The lawsuit alleges that X “breeds massive copyright infringement that harms music creators” by failing to take action against posts containing copyrighted music. Copyright issues on X have been a problem even before Elon Musk’s takeover, as the lawsuit cites that the NMPA began sending infringement notices to Twitter “on a weekly basis” in December 2021.

    The court is letting some of the NMPA’s claims stand, including allegations that X “allowed users to pay for more forgiving treatment under its anti-infringement policies” through its premium subscription, which allows users to upload longer videos. It also denied X’s motion to dismiss the NMPA’s claims that X failed to respond to claims in a timely manner and didn’t take appropriate action against “repeat infringers.”

    However, the judge agreed to dismiss the NMPA’s allegations that X engaged in direct copyright infringement and that the platform is “vicariously liable” for direct infringements by users.

    “As the Supreme Court has acknowledged, ‘the lines between direct infringement, contributory infringement, and vicarious liability are not clearly drawn,’” Trauger writes. “The ultimate questions presented by this case are whether and to what extent X Corp. may be liable for the infringing acts of users on its platform.” As the lawsuit moves forward, the judge notes that X’s monitoring and control over users “are relevant to that inquiry,” and so are the platform’s financial incentives to “tolerate infringement.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous Article6 Months After New York Banned Airbnb, New Jersey Is Doing Great
    Next Article Microsoft invokes VCRs in motion to dismiss The New York Times’s AI lawsuit

    Related Posts

    Blink bumps its budget buzzer to 2K

    Blink bumps its budget buzzer to 2K

    May 6, 2026
    Google’s AI search summaries will now quote Reddit

    Google’s AI search summaries will now quote Reddit

    May 6, 2026
    Energizer’s new coin batteries won’t cause ingestion burns if swallowed

    Energizer’s new coin batteries won’t cause ingestion burns if swallowed

    May 6, 2026
    The clippening

    The clippening

    May 6, 2026
    Chrome’s AI features may be hogging 4GB of your computer storage

    Chrome’s AI features may be hogging 4GB of your computer storage

    May 6, 2026
    Apple agrees to pay iPhone owners 0 million for not delivering AI Siri

    Apple agrees to pay iPhone owners $250 million for not delivering AI Siri

    May 5, 2026
    Our Picks
    Google’s AI search summaries will now quote Reddit

    Google’s AI search summaries will now quote Reddit

    May 6, 2026
    Energizer’s new coin batteries won’t cause ingestion burns if swallowed

    Energizer’s new coin batteries won’t cause ingestion burns if swallowed

    May 6, 2026
    The Remarkable Paper Pure is the best digital notepad I’ve ever used

    The Remarkable Paper Pure is the best digital notepad I’ve ever used

    May 6, 2026
    The clippening

    The clippening

    May 6, 2026
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    Chrome’s AI features may be hogging 4GB of your computer storage News

    Chrome’s AI features may be hogging 4GB of your computer storage

    By News RoomMay 6, 2026

    Google Chrome may be taking up more of your storage than expected thanks to a…

    Apple agrees to pay iPhone owners 0 million for not delivering AI Siri

    Apple agrees to pay iPhone owners $250 million for not delivering AI Siri

    May 5, 2026
    Google Home’s Gemini AI can handle more complicated requests

    Google Home’s Gemini AI can handle more complicated requests

    May 5, 2026
    Apple could let you pick a favorite AI model in iOS 27

    Apple could let you pick a favorite AI model in iOS 27

    May 5, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2026 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.