Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    5 More Physics Equations Everyone Should Know

    October 13, 2025

    How BlackBerry Messenger set texting free

    October 12, 2025

    Welcome to the ‘papers, please’ internet

    October 12, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » What Satellite Images Reveal About the US Bombing of Iran’s Nuclear Sites
    Security

    What Satellite Images Reveal About the US Bombing of Iran’s Nuclear Sites

    News RoomBy News RoomJune 27, 20253 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    When the United States bombed Iran in the early hours of Sunday local time, it targeted three facilities central to the country’s nuclear ambitions: the Fordow uranium enrichment plant, the Natanz nuclear facility, and the Isfahan nuclear technology center. Newly released satellite images show the impact of the attack—at least, what can be seen on the ground.

    The brunt of the bombing focused on Fordow, where US forces dropped a dozen GBU-57 massive ordnance penetrators as part of its “Midnight Hammer” operation. These 30,000-pound “bunker-buster” bombs are designed to penetrate as deep as 200 feet into the earth before detonating. The Fordow complex is approximately 260 feet underground.

    That gap accounts for some of the uncertainty over exactly how much damage the Fordow site sustained. President Donald Trump shared a post on his Truth Social platform following the attack that declared “Fordow is gone,” and later said in a televised address that “Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.” His own military, however, was slightly more circumspect about the outcome in a Sunday morning briefing. “It would be way too early for me to comment on what may or may not still be there,” said general Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    Satellite imagery can inherently only tell you so much about a structure that is situated so far below the surface of the earth. But before and after imagery is the best publicly available information about the bombing’s impact.

    A satellite image from before the US bombing of Fordow.

    Photo: MAXAR Technologies/Handout via Reuters

    Image may contain Land Nature Outdoors Plant Vegetation Water Tree and Woodland

    A satellite image from after the US bombing of Fordow.

    Photo: MAXAR Technologies/Handout via Reuters

    “What we see are six craters, two clusters of three, where there were 12 massive ordnance penetrators dropped,” says Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute’s James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. “The idea is you hit the same spot over and over again to kind of dig down.”

    The specific locations of those craters matter as well, says Joseph Rodgers, deputy director and fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Project on Nuclear Issues. While the entrance tunnels to the Fordow complex appear not to have been targeted, US bombs fell on what are likely ventilation shafts, based on satellite images of early construction at the site.

    “The reason that you’d want to target a ventilation shaft is that it’s a more direct route to the core components of the underground facility,” says Rodgers.

    That direct route is especially important given how deep underground Fordow was built. The US military relies on “basically a computer model” of the facility, says Lewis, which tells them “how much pressure it could take before it would severely damage everything inside and maybe even collapse the facility.” By bombarding specific targeted areas with multiple munitions, the US didn’t need bombs capable of penetrating the full 260 feet to cause substantial damage.

    “They’re probably not trying to get all the way into the facility. They’re probably just trying to get close enough to it and crush it with a shockwave,” Lewis says. “If you send a big enough shockwave through that facility, it’s going to kill people, break stuff, damage the integrity of it.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleThis smart smoke alarm could be a worthy Nest Protect replacement
    Next Article Google quietly introduced precise Bluetooth tracking on the Pixel Watch 3

    Related Posts

    How a Travel YouTuber Captured Nepal’s Revolution for the World

    October 11, 2025

    Tile Tracking Tags Can Be Exploited by Tech-Savvy Stalkers, Researchers Say

    October 9, 2025

    Google’s Latest AI Ransomware Defense Only Goes So Far

    October 6, 2025

    Where Do Your Passwords Go When You Die?

    October 4, 2025

    DHS Has Been Collecting US Citizens’ DNA for Years

    September 30, 2025

    ‘SIM Farms’ Are a Spam Plague. A Giant One in New York Threatened US Infrastructure, Feds Say

    September 30, 2025
    Our Picks

    How BlackBerry Messenger set texting free

    October 12, 2025

    Welcome to the ‘papers, please’ internet

    October 12, 2025

    ChatGPT is becoming an everything app

    October 12, 2025

    Scientist Who Was Offline ‘Living His Best Life’ Stunned by Nobel Prize Win

    October 12, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    Games

    The ASUS TUF T500 Is a Great Gaming PC for Beginners

    By News RoomOctober 12, 2025

    Because it’s so easy to build a gaming desktop at home, companies making prebuilt machines…

    Apple ends support for Clips video-editing app

    October 11, 2025

    How The Verge and our readers manage kids’ screen time

    October 11, 2025

    The AirPods 4 and Lego’s brick-ified Grogu are our favorite deals this week

    October 11, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.