Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Google is rolling out a fix for Pixel back button issues

    August 5, 2025

    Apple is suing Apple Cinemas

    August 5, 2025

    The best iPad deals you can get in August

    August 5, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Why Jolly Ranchers Are Banned in the UK but Not the US
    Science

    Why Jolly Ranchers Are Banned in the UK but Not the US

    News RoomBy News RoomJuly 12, 20253 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    Adopted in 1958, the GRAS exemption was intended to cover the use of commonplace ingredients, explains Jensen Jose, regulatory counsel for the nonprofit watchdog Center for Science in the Public Interest, based in Washington, DC. “It was so you wouldn’t require a new piece of legislation every time you added salt to a sandwich.”

    However, as the food industry’s appetite for additives grew over the following decades, the GRAS rule came to cover a widening array of ingredients—with the manufacturers of these additives left effectively to govern themselves. “The hope is that they conduct scientific studies of their own,” says Jennifer Pomeranz, a public health lawyer and associate professor at New York University’s School of Global Public Health. “But legally speaking, no one’s checking.” In theory, Pomeranz says, “a company can add a new ingredient and not even list its chemical compound on the packet.”

    The result is that a host of additives, recognized as safe under FDA regulations, are banned by other governments over safety fears. “Compounds are added to food for shelf life, aesthetics, and convenience,” says Lindsay Malone, a registered dietitian nutritionist and instructor in the Department of Nutrition at the School of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University. “Even down to how easily food comes out of the plastic container.”

    Compounds that carry health risks line the shelves of US grocery stores, consumed by Americans every day. Take butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), for example, a preservative that has been linked to hormone disruption. It’s often found in cereals, dried snacks, and packaged cake mixes. Meanwhile a packet of chewing gum, potato chips, or processed meat may include butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), a probable carcinogen. Both are exempt from FDA regulations through the GRAS loophole.

    In isolation, compounds like BHT, BHA, and MOAH aren’t necessarily dangerous. Public health advocates are more concerned about their cumulative effect—a lifetime of eating common, addictive, harmful compounds. Malone says a diet heavily consisting of ultra-processed foods—most likely to contain additives—can impact gut health. A disrupted microbiome is hypothesized to lead to increased gut permeability (also known as “leaky gut”), a proposed though unproven condition where pathogens and toxins are thought to leak into the bloodstream.

    There has been some regulatory momentum in the US against harmful additives. In January, the FDA announced a nationwide ban on Red 3, the petroleum-derived food dye that turns candy scarlet—studies from the 1980s and 1990s showed it can cause cancer in lab rats. In 2024, it also outlawed brominated vegetable oil (BVO), a stabilizer for artificial flavors that can cause bromine toxicity, banned by the UK in 1970.

    The FDA didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment from WIRED.

    Both additives, however, were first outlawed by California, in 2023—Jose says it’s more effective banning compounds through state legislatures than the FDA. “We got California to introduce a bill, pass it, sign a law, and get Red 3 banned before the FDA even responded to our 2022 petition. If a company can’t sell something in California or New York, they may as well reformulate their product for the whole country.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleMcDonald’s AI Hiring Bot Exposed Millions of Applicants’ Data to Hackers Who Tried the Password ‘123456’
    Next Article Rivian R1S review: second time’s the charm

    Related Posts

    The Very Real Case for Brain-Computer Implants

    August 5, 2025

    Scientists Say New Government Climate Report Twists Their Work

    August 4, 2025

    States Are Moving to Protect Access to Vaccines

    August 3, 2025

    A ‘Grand Unified Theory’ of Math Just Got a Little Bit Closer

    August 2, 2025

    Watch Our Livestream Replay: Inside Katie Drummond’s Viral Interview With Bryan Johnson

    August 2, 2025

    The Grave Long-Term Effects of the Gaza Malnutrition Crisis

    August 1, 2025
    Our Picks

    Apple is suing Apple Cinemas

    August 5, 2025

    The best iPad deals you can get in August

    August 5, 2025

    The best laptop deals you can get right now

    August 5, 2025

    WhatsApp will show a ‘safety overview’ before you join unknown group chats

    August 5, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    Business

    ChatGPT’s Study Mode Is Here. It Won’t Fix Education’s AI Problems

    By News RoomAugust 5, 2025

    The school year starts soon for many students, and ChatGPT has announced a new “study…

    Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes

    August 5, 2025

    Anthropic Revokes OpenAI’s Access to Claude

    August 5, 2025

    Google Gemini can now create AI-generated bedtime stories

    August 5, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.