Close Menu
Technology Mag

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Google’s AI try-on imagines your feet in new shoes

    October 8, 2025

    A Twitch streamer gave birth live, with Twitch’s CEO in the chat

    October 8, 2025

    Amazon is putting prescription drugs in vending machines

    October 8, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    Technology Mag
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • News
    • Business
    • Games
    • Gear
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Security
    • Trending
    • Press Release
    Technology Mag
    Home » Would You Still Use Google if It Didn’t Pay Apple $20 Billion to Get on Your iPhone?
    Business

    Would You Still Use Google if It Didn’t Pay Apple $20 Billion to Get on Your iPhone?

    News RoomBy News RoomMay 3, 20243 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email

    Microsoft has poured over $100 billion into developing its Bing search engine over the past two decades but has little market share to show for it. About nine out of every 10 web searches in the US are made through Google, with Bing splitting the remaining queries with a long list of small competitors.

    On Thursday the US government asked a federal judge in Washington, DC, to rule that Google maintains that lead illegally, by unfairly manipulating users to keep Microsoft and other competitors down.

    Google’s dominance drove the US Department of Justice to sue the company in 2020 alleging that it had violated antitrust law by using exclusionary contracts to maintain a monopoly. The two sides went into a secretive trial at the end of last year before breaking for nearly five months for US Judge Amit Mehta to digest the evidence.

    Mehta heard closing arguments on Thursday, with government attorneys arguing that without his intervention Google’s dominance would remain in years to come—despite nascent threats from AI chatbots like ChatGPT. “The search engine industry has been impervious to any competitor entering,” attorney Kenneth Dintzer said.

    The case is the first to go to trial out of a handful of lawsuits the government has brought against the biggest tech companies since stepping up antitrust scrutiny of the industry in 2019 under then-President Donald Trump. The Biden administration hasn’t let off the gas.

    Central to the government’s case against Google is the over $20 billion it says that Google pays Apple annually to be the default search engine on iPhones and the Safari browser across much of the world. Google pays an additional more than $1.5 billion a year to wireless carriers and device makers, and more than $150 million to browsers, for similar defaults in the US, according to the government. Google can afford to pay those sums and still enjoy enormous profits because it has the US market for search and search ads cornered, the government alleges.

    Google’s attorneys counter that companies such as Apple choose Google as the default because it offers a better experience to users, not just because they are getting payouts. When browsers such as Mozilla have opted for alternatives to Google, they have lost users because of the change, the search company argues. “Google lawfully acquired monopoly power and scale,” attorney John Schmidtlein told Mehta. “Microsoft missed the boat.”

    Before Mehta now is the question of whether Google unfairly earned its popularity.

    Profit Boost

    Google’s deals with Apple date to 2002, when the Safari developer first gained the option to integrate Google search into the browser, according to court papers. The payments started after Google cofounder Sergey Brin in 2005 raised the idea of sharing a slice of the company’s blossoming search revenue or “helping Apple out in other ways,” Brin wrote, according to court papers.

    But in a deal struck that year, Google got something in exchange for agreeing to pay Apple half of its sales: Google search would be required to be the default in Safari. The requirement has spread to more Apple services in the years since, while the revenue share and related incentive fees have fluctuated.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleCrave’s Tease Impractically Puts a Vibrator on Your Ring Finger
    Next Article Instagram introduces new interactive stickers for Stories

    Related Posts

    OpenAI Wants ChatGPT to Be Your Future Operating System

    October 7, 2025

    OpenAI’s Blockbuster AMD Deal Is a Bet on Near-Limitless Demand for AI

    October 7, 2025

    WIRED Roundup: The New Fake World of OpenAI’s Social Video App

    October 6, 2025

    Vibe Coding Is the New Open Source—in the Worst Way Possible

    October 6, 2025

    Your Delivery Robot Is Here

    October 6, 2025

    Sam Altman Says the GPT-5 Haters Got It All Wrong

    October 6, 2025
    Our Picks

    A Twitch streamer gave birth live, with Twitch’s CEO in the chat

    October 8, 2025

    Amazon is putting prescription drugs in vending machines

    October 8, 2025

    Amazfit’s Active 2, one of our favorite fitness trackers, is a steal at just $81

    October 8, 2025

    HMD’s Touch 4G is a dumb-smart-phone

    October 8, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Nothing Ear 3 review: work in progress

    By News RoomOctober 8, 2025

    Nothing’s Ear 3 buds remind me more than anything else of the Ear 1, the…

    The 208 best October Prime Day deals

    October 8, 2025

    Big Tech is ‘donating’ to Trump’s ‘nonprofits’ 

    October 8, 2025

    Some of our favorite gadgets are cheaper than ever for fall Prime Day

    October 8, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Technology Mag. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.